What books did Australian teens enjoy reading most in the last two years?

What books did Australian teens enjoy reading most in the last two years?

What books did teens enjoy most in 2023 and 2024? The Discovering a Good Read (DAGR) study is about to publish some findings from our survey about Australian secondary school students’ leisure reading behaviour.

Published in the Synergy in early October 2024 our article outlines key trends in student responses to a question that asked them about the books they enjoyed reading most in the previous year. There was an impressive diversity in the books they identified, showcasing wide-ranging individual tastes and interests and a broad spectrum of engagement, including a range of genres (fantasy, mystery and crime, romance) and book types (young adult and middle grade literature, contemporary fiction, non-fiction and classics).

We are sharing an Excel Spreadsheet of this data with our readers under a Creative Commons License – CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.*

DAGR_Book-enjoyed-most-past-12-months

*This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form and for noncommercial purposes only.

 

 

Teen Reading Project Update

Teen Reading Project Update

2023 is the final year of our project: ‘Discovering a ‘Good Read’: Cultural Pathways to Reading for Australian Teens in a Digital Age’. Earlier this year we published a newsletter providing an update on our research activities in 2022 and a preview of some our findings about how much Australian teenagers read for pleasure and the types of books they enjoy reading.

You can read the newsletter in full here

 

New publication: Beyond the “good story” and sales history: Where is the reader in the publishing process?

New publication: Beyond the “good story” and sales history: Where is the reader in the publishing process?

In this paper we investigated whether there might be structures within the book industry that mitigate against publishing a greater quantity of diverse stories, or that might hinder a search for more diverse authors or a diverse readership. We interviewed a range of Australian publishing representatives. Through our questions we sought to understand how readers are understood or imagined by publishers, as well as the industry processes by which young adult titles are acquired. We found that two processes contributed to the lack of information about audiences: the over-riding value of the “good story” as a criterion for publishing a title; and the reliance on sales data as evidence of reader demand. Missing are mechanisms that provide insight into the preferences of real readers. Without this market feedback publishers are more likely to imagine readers, and readerships, to be “just like them”. This creates barriers to the creation of new and more diverse readerships and, thus, to new markets.

You can read the full article here

New publication: #Ownvoices, Disruptive Platforms, and Reader Reception in Young Adult Publishing

New publication: #Ownvoices, Disruptive Platforms, and Reader Reception in Young Adult Publishing

In this paper we examine the effects of the #ownvoices movement in the market for, and consumption of, young adult fiction through a focus on the promotional strategies and critical reception of a single book: Australian author Craig Silvey’s most recent young adult novel, Honeybee. Our data included author and publisher media interviews, social media reviews, and literary reviews in mainstream publications. Honeybee was selected as a case study because it has the hallmarks of a nationally influential Australian cultural product: its author has previously written novels that explore themes of discrimination and his works have been adapted for the screen and are considered suitable for study in Australian schools. On the other hand, Silvey, a heterosexual man, made the controversial choice to write from the perspective of a young trans woman. Our analysis found that the identity standpoint of the reader heavily influenced their judgement of the aesthetic quality of the novel, not simply the ethics of appropriating the voice of a marginalized other. Some self-identified LGBTQI+ readers also advocated strongly for a new kind of allyship in the book industry, one that platforms more diverse creators and thus redistributes opportunity in the creative industries.

You can read the full article https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/53952835